Social Networks Will Be Like Air

March 17, 2009

Charlene Li is an independent thought leader on emerging technolgies. Her panel focused on social technologies, interactive media, marketing  and the future of social networks. She has written on the topic in her blog, “The Altimeter ,” and the book she co-authored, “Groundswell: Winning In A World Transformed By Social Technologies.”

social networks“Social networks will be like air,” said Li. “They will hold everything that we do online and offline.” But Li mentioned it is just the beginning and still very early. Patience will be needed.

What kind of information will be needed for the transition to occur:
1) Identity- who you are
2) Contacts- who you know.
3) Activities- what you do.
Li also emphasized the importance of building a trusting relationship with her example, “In Google We Trust.” She said that Google holds much of her personal information and that she was comfortable with this because of her trust in Google. Li believes that when users feel comfortable in disclosing personal information,
open networks will become the norm.
social networks
Her advice in social networking:
1) Evaluate where social makes sense- identify where social netowrk data and content can/should be integrated in the experience; leverage existing identity and social graphs where your audience already is; get your privacy and permission policies and processes aligned with an open strategy; find your trust agents.
2) Get your backend data in order- remove multiple sign-ins, registration, and profiles for people; have a single identity for customers and prospects.
3) Prepare to intergrate social networks into your organization- social networks will disrupt traditional infomation flows.

Crash the Server – How to Market your Movie by Achieving Webisode Awesomeness

March 16, 2009

The Crash the Server: Webisode Awesomeness panel was in fact awesome. Panelists Zak Knutson and Joey Figueroa of Chop Shop Entertainment were brutally honest and a cynically funny. I enjoyed every minute of it!  They produce  dvd featurettes and EPKs, feature length documentaries, and internet webisodes for big budget studio and independent films. “We enjoy making DVD material the most because it is how we got started, ” said Knutson.

Webisode PanelThey shared stories about working on Kevin Smith movies.  For Clerks 2  they produced internet webisodes, EPK materials, and DVD added value content. Their first project with webisodes was Train Wreck, a 75 webisode video production diaries produced for Clerks2.com. “What studio EPK can’t do, webisodes do, do,” said Figueroa. The material made the Clerks 2 DVD one of the best selling and best reviewed DVDs of 2006.

Their latest webisode series is called Money Shots for Zach and Miri Make a Porno. They said it was tough because NPA now labels internet webisodes as promotional material. The NPA limited a lot of the video they wanted to publish on the Web. “You have to be 18 to watch the webisodes, but to see the movie you only have to be 17, which doesn’t make any f***ing sense to me,” said Knutson. 

They closed the panel with giving advice on publishing webisodes and other online video. They suggested quick stop entertainment, because they have a huge fan base and are having problems finding content to put up. “Your goal is to get on as many sites as possible; and itunes, itunes, itunes, people always find videos on itunes.”

The videos showed and talked about during the panel:

The Good The Bad and The Man- Kevin Smith screens Clerks 2 for friends Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez, for their feedback and opinions.

Money Shots: #1 Kevin and Seth- Kevin Smith directs Seth Rogen by telling him to add a little more “Afflecktion” to his acting. 

 

How Do You Measure Success??

March 15, 2009

collegehumor

“In a word, Digg. Ask anyone at collegehumor how many times we’ve been number 1 on Digg, 7 times.” Ricky Van Veen (collegehumor.com)

Has Privacy Been Ruptured by New Technologies?

March 15, 2009

 

When was the last time you googled your own name? Ever worried that a potential employer may glance at your facebook or myspace? With all of the recent technological advancements and the growing presence of social networks, the line between what is public and private information has become increasingly blurred. This was the topic of discussion at the Sxsw panel “Is Privacy Dead, Or Just Confused?” Judith Donath (MIT Media Laboratory) spoke about how with every technology we choose to utilize, there is a tradeoff.

privacy1

When we use google, facebook or myspace, we are agreeing to their terms of service, however, is one of those terms losing some control of your public persona? Siva Vaidhyanathan, a Professor at the University of Virginia, used the example of Michael Phelps to show that often times institutions may disapprove of us as far as employability based on the information that exists about us online. Vaidhyanathan argued that Michael Phelps didn’t deserve to take an economic hit because his private pictures were made public. Donath also made the point that if someone was to aggregate all of the information about you that is made available online, it would be a fabulous self portrait made up of records of your searches, transaction histories, status updates, etc. Alice Marwick, a PhD Candidate at New York University made that point that the blurring of this line may exists because technologies have advanced faster than our social norms. These technologies have not existed long enough for it to be commonly understood what is and is not acceptable in our online interactions. All four panelists did agree on the fact that people need to be more aware of the information they leave behind therefore allowing them to make more informed decisions on the activities they conduct online.


Pics from the Big Digg Shindig

March 15, 2009

A huge crowd showed up for the live Diggnation at Stubbs. Kevin Rose and Alex Albrecht greeted their throngs of tech fans and proceeded to the couch for some beer and news. What a party. It felt like a rock concert, and these guys are definitely rock stars of the tech world.
digg1
digg2
digg3


Politics, Technology, and Pop Culture

March 14, 2009

Politics, Technology, and Pop Culture, comprised of Lawrence Lessig of Stanford Law School, Alex Wellen, Deputy Political Director of Digital Content at CNNPolitics.com, Dan Patterson of ABC News, Tom Serres CEO of Piryx Inc, Amber Ettinger (Obama Girl) and Mark McKinnon Vice Chairman of Public Strategies Inc.

Politics, Technology, and Pop Culture

Politics, Technology, and Pop Culture

 

 

McKinnon, commented on the earlier Republican campaigns saying, “Nobody even had Blackberries. The whole process took a matter of days.” Compared to his experience on the McCain campaign he said “we really had what I call a democratization of politics and… the campaigns lose control of their message.”
He said of Dean and Obama, “They knew how to make technology harness the passion and talents of their followers.”

Patterson spoke to the technology gap between generation Y and baby boomers and said that it was “more of a perceived gap than an actual gap,” and that he has not so much witnessed a real technology gap. “It will eventually work itself out,” he said.

Wellen, made a few comments about how they at CNN look at the shift.
“Politics pushes us forward,” he said. “I spend all my time thinking about integration or convergence… It’s starting on TV and its pushing people and attracting them to go to the web” and visa versa. He explained that the Holy Grail is when they are both being used in a “Two screen experience.”

Lessig weighed in on the 2008 election saying “participation was more than just a cool ap. Participation was something that you thought you were going to actually move politics.”
He warned that if things don’t change with Obama, “we’re going to be extraordinary let down if it isn’t something very different.” He went on the explain that Washington is full of ordinary politicians and “the question is whether Obama will be able to carry it to the next level and actually be able to change them too.”

Serres, asked McKinnon to comment on his recent article about how he believes that Twitter has “jumped the shark.” McKinnon exclaimed that “the problem is that people are confused into thinking that more communication is better communication and then it just becomes noise”
“Increasingly we have to be able to step back and think that the message is about quality not quantity.”

Patterson jumped in and defended Twitter based on the utilization of filtering aps and the usefulness of Twitter as a tool for communication. He cited several examples of his use of it in his profession as a journalist.

The conversation then turned the attention to the pop culture side of the discussion as Serres asked Ettinge to describe her experience of being a “human meme.”

“It’s been a crazy, almost two years now,” she said. “People were asking me about his policies and and I was like ‘I just a have a crush on this guy.’”

She said “I’ve hung up my bikini and put on a business suit” and speak at political conventions.

Patterson commented on the participation of pop culture in the recent campaign.
“Obama branded himself in a way that inspired activists. Obama worked a brand and that inspired people.” he said. “Like Amber, he became a meme.”

The subject of political remixes came up and Lessig remarked on the remixes, YouTube usage and copywright.
“The wide ranging use of creativity in this last campaign are going to force change,” he said and then went off on a tirade against current copywright law to much audience approval.

The panel closed with a discussion about online voting. McKinnon agreed with it saying he thought it was a good idea.
“When you plow through it all, the greater emphasis should be on participation,” he said. “Anything that creates greater participation, I think we should encourage”


Tony Hsieh, Zappos.com Opening Remarks Images

March 14, 2009

drawing
drawing2


Tips for Making Ideas Happen with Scott Belsky

March 14, 2009

Creativity x Organization = Impact

Scott Belsky, CEO of Behance speaks about the fact that most ideas never happen. “I strongly believe that great ideas don’t happen simply becuase they are great or by accident,” said Belsky. He believes this is mostly due to a lack of accountability, lack of leadership, disorganization and isolated networks and lack of feedback exchange. For him, “the greatest breakthroughs happen when very creative people are also productive”. His company, Behance, goes out and consults companies by meeting with and interviewing the best creatives (photographers, writers, agencies, churches, non-profits, etc.) to find out when and how to make good ideas happen. Scott

Belsky’s “Action Method” includes three stages that boost productivity in a creative environment:

1. Action Items – Measure a meeting in action steps. Often times they don’t have agendas. Don’t meet just because it’s Monday. Be comfortable canceling recurring meetings.

2. Create a Backburner Ritual – Once a month, go through the “backburner” items to decide whether they are worth pursuing or need to come off the “to do” list in order to focus on more important things.

3. Reference Items – Pull content and ideas from various sources.

He shared a couple of other great tips to make ideas come into fruition such as, generating ideas in moderation and prioritize. Every company has a “sober monitor” (aka the idea killer) so creatives need to focus attention on ideas that make sense. He also emphasized to seek cross-pollination by not being afraid to fight your way to breakthroughs. See other’s points of view even if you hate it, don’t become burdened by consensus and don’t chose the lowest common denominator.

Belsky is also currently writing a book titled “Make Ideas Happen” that will be published by Penguin.


IM Video Journalism with David Dunkley Gyimah

March 14, 2009

At the Integrated Multimedia Video Journalism panel with David Dunkley Gyimah, British VJ(video journalist, lecturer and publisher of View Magazine.

David Gyimah

David Gyimah

Gyimah began his video career with BBC had a stint at Channel One as a VJ then back to BBC and is now a Lecturer and two years into a PhD study.

Gyimah defines VJ as “Simply it is the craft of one person producing a factual video story from the start to it being broadcast or going online.” Go here to read {a lot} more.

Gyimah said when he began with Channel 1 (a 24 hr news channel modeled after New York 1) in 1994 that the 25 odd VJs were very “Anti TV” and very much had the mindset that video journalism would replace traditional broadcast TV news because it had “so many assets that it couldn’t help but lead the future.”

He said they were met with network push-back with attacks like calling it “rubbish” because “one person can do it all.” The VJ model was very threatening to the unionized media professionals.

In 1996 the VJ revolution experienced burn out when “We realized that TV is not dead.” He compared his profession to the “X-Men of the news” as they were the outcasts among the journalism community.

Currently, the atmosphere has changed and with the advent of the Internet being turned to for news more often, there is a new rise in video journalism.

“When it comes to the net, there is no code yet as I believe that is set in stone,” said Gyimah. “We’ve all been taking TV’s language and applying that and it hasn’t quite worked. Video journalism needs a more cinematic- hightened visual base.”

He went on to explain that, “In a visual medium pictures drive the narrative. As a visual medium your pictures are king… You shoot with the edit in mind- when you’re shooting your story. You’re shooting the finished product.”

He says that a VJ should approach a project very focused and actually take very little video with possibly 40 minutes of video to 15 final minutes and all in short, quick cuts.

“It’s highly risky, but it’s doable.”

He said that a VJ should be so comfortable with their skills that shooting like this should be a natural as talking, in that you should be able to choose your shots and clips as quick as you would words and phrases as you speak.
He said it’s “about shooting the edit line.”

“You don’t need to shoot all that stuff,” he said. “Let the visuals drive the narrative”

He also explained that for video journalism to survive it has to be able to eek out stories that network news don’t cover or for some reason won’t cover.
He said that broadcast news are losing viewers and when news shows are changed to attempt to regain viewers its the graphic intro and the music that is changed while the story telling format remains the same.

Video journalism has an aesthetic movement derived from French new wave and has a free form film making quality to it that appeals to a younger viewer.


GREAT EXPECTATIONSi

February 19, 2009

Disclaimer:

This post may contain usage of the adjective “crunk” or its derivatives. The author is aware that any use of “crunk” or its derivatives may/will make this post both dated and lame. However, whether he be ironic or just lazy, the author has ignored the potential negative fallout from the use of “crunk” or its derivatives in effort to avoid the use of the adjective “stoked” or its derivatives.

So I am pretty stoked crunk about the SXSWi schedule and events this year. I will be attending on Saturday, Monday and Tuesday and am already suffering from panel-conflict-anxiety. So many good panels stacked at the same time!

Do I want to attend “Comedy on Television and the Web” on Saturday at 5:00 or “Politics, Technology, and Pop Culture”? *chest begins to tighten*

or

?

*finger tips numbing*… oh my.
Maybe being crunk is a bad idea.

I have barely been able to even wrap my head around Saturday so far, and none of my panel selections are firm, but I am excited about these two politically focused panels.

Tentative Saturday panel plans (please don’t hold me to this… I don’t need that kind of pressure) are as follows:

11:30 am · “What your Startup Can Learn from Barack Obama and Howard Dean”
This panel features Scott Goodstein, CEO of Revolution Messaging LLC, who was the “External Online Director for Obama for America, and developed the campaign’s social networking platforms.” Impressive.

Clay Johnson, Director of Sunlight Labs, who “was one of the four founders of Blue State Digital, the progressive left’s premier technology and online strategy firm…” and “was also responsible for Barack Obama’s Web presence” will  be present.

This looks to be a very interesting panel. Hopefully I’ll learn how to get my idea elected president.

Crunk.

Then at 5:00 pm the “Politics, Technology, and Pop Culture” panel is looking pretty good.

I’m looking at you, Lessig.

This panel not only features Lawrence Lessig(Stanford Law School) , Mark McKinnon (Public Strategies Inc) , Dan Patterson(ABC), and Amber Ettinger (Obama Girl), it hints/promises at “offering a glimpse into the future of global politics.”

Do they have a magic eight ball on the panel as well?

+

+

=

CRUNK/bizarre?

Lots to look forward to.

Remember, this panel is in direct competition with the “Comedy on Television and the Web” panel… so we’ll see what happens.