Keynote Address: Privacy vs. Publicity

March 14, 2010

It’s the constant battle of new media: Where do you draw the line between privacy and publicity? That was the subject of Saturday’s keynote address, delivered by Danah Boyd, social media researcher for Microsoft New England. She believes online privacy is not dead. However, she said privacy is understanding how technology flows.

Boyd focused much of her talk on privacy issues with Google Buzz and Facebook. Regarding Google, she was concerned with the amount of information that was available when Buzz launched earlier this year. Boyd stated that just because something is publicly accessible doesn’t mean people want it publicized. As for Facebook, Boyd said only 35% of users went into the security settings that changed in December and made their information private.

The keynote then focused on teens and the information they’re putting on the internet. Boyd said she has talked to tween-age girls who have deliberately posted risqué pictures of themselves in order to get a modeling contract via the web like Tila Tequila. She believes teens want to be celebrities, but don’t understand the difficulties that come along with it – like paparazzi. “There’s a big difference between being center of attention at school and being stalked by photographers,” Boyd said. She went on to say the worst thing parents can do when talking about privacy with their kids is say, “Back in my day…” Parents have to involve their kids in the discussion and genuinely value their feedback.

Boyd wrapped up her keynote with a key point. She said, “Wanting privacy is not about having something to hide. It’s about wanting to maintain control.” The question you have to ask is how public are you willing to be?


ScreenBurn Arcade SXSWi 2010

March 13, 2010

 

ScreenBurn is a great feature of SXSWi that gets bigger every year!  It’s a chance for video gamers to get hands with digital media industries.

This year’s exhibit is definitely promoting the art of the video games.  One of the best exhibits was a collection of 16 award winning creative achievements from the video game world.  Into the Pixel is presenting this work.

Harmonix has a full Rock Band set-up to promote the Rock Band Network.  It’s an idea some were just waiting to have happen.  It allows musicians and bands to self-publish their music in a Rock Band platform.  This allows the independent artist a way to create gameplay tracks of their OWN music for others to download and play!  Who needs a label now?

There was also a huge LEGO layout. Not sure why, but it is pretty cool, thanks to TexLug!


What Happens when the New York Times Dies?

March 13, 2010

The clash between legacy media and new media came alive Saturday as David Carr, of the New York Times, and Markos Moulitsas, the founder of Daily Kos, argued about the relevance, the importance and the place of the revered paper.

While the debate got heated, both sides were civil as Carr debated Moulitsas’ arguement whether or not the New York Times still filled its esteemed journalistic role.

Moulitsas stated that he likes traditional media outlets and uses them for a lot of the content posted to The Daily Kos.  However, he believes that many of the issues at hand in the new business are based on those entities simply not doing their job.

“Most people just want traditional media to do their job,” he said. “There’s criticism, but that doesn’t mean we want them to go away.”

Carr said new media outlets, such as Twitter, could provide information, but could not compete with the type of investigative, world spanning journalism The New York Times aims to provide.

“Accountability reporting would be in retreat in a world with no New York Times,” Carr said.

Moulitsas insinuated the importance of traditional media has been exaggerated. He also pointed out mistakes the Times had made in the lead up to the invasion of Iraq.  He quipped that the New York Times should ”stop being a stenographer for power.”

He also said the role of bloggers has been under-appreciated. “Daily Kos knew about Sarah Palin because we covered her election campaign two years before,” he said. Moulitsas also said NBC news was having to look her up on Wikipedia while the writers for Daily Kos already knew about some of her controversial stances, such as her participation in the Alaska Independence Party.

Ultimately, the title of the panel was misleading. It played out with two sides debating the role and importance of a single newspaper. Instead of talking about what the media landscape will look like in a post New York Times world, it devolved into an argument about which medium was more crucial. Instead of looking into the future, the panel settled for arguing about the past.


RIP Jeff Goldblum

March 13, 2010

Remember when actor Jeff Goldblum died? It had to be true because I saw it on the internet. Problem was – it was a hoax.

Stories like this can spread like wildfire with the help of social media such as Twitter. Goldblum himself had to go on Comedy Central and read his own obituary to let people know it wasn’t true. However, this isn’t always the case. Stories like Michael Jackson’s death broke online. It took mainstream media an hour or so after TMZ broke the story to finally get it confirmed.

In a panel called “RIP Jeff Goldblum,” Megan McCarthy from Techmeme talked about how to tell fact from fiction. She presented three keys to do this.

1. Know your source – The Goldblum story was on an obvious hoax web site. If someone had googled Global Associated News, they could have learned it was a hoax immediately.

2. Know the information – Know what is being passed along. For example, a tech executive sent a tweet to friends that a former Myspace executive was joining his company. He attached a link that Rick Rolled people, but the people who spread it never clicked on that link. They simply retweeted it as fact.

3. Know the big picture – See if a story passes the smell test. What is the big picture? Does someone have an agenda? This can make you understand if something is really news.


From Blogger to Social Media Guru to Public Speaker

March 13, 2010

A lot of people have blogs these days. That means they have a voice – and that voice could earn them big bucks.

In a SXSWi panel called “From Blogger to Social Media Guru to Public Speaker,” Nick Morgan and Tim Sanders discussed their advice for hitting it big in the world of public speaking. Their rules were simple. First, do not self-publish a book. Sanders and Morgan say meeting coordinators are looking for a speaker printed by a reputable publisher. Secondly, create a DVD of yourself in public speaking situations. Pay a board guy to make a dub of the video system feed and pay a stringer to shoot crowd shots. Have a professional then edit the DVD together and send that out. Finally, do not cuss in speeches. Sanders and Morgan say this will kill your public speaking career.

However, this advice is not always true. Gary Vaynerchuk is living proof of that. He self-published his book which became a NY Times best seller. Gary cusses during his presentations…a lot. Yet, he is one of the most successful public speakers going right now.

Several people replied to the tweets during this particular panel, disagreeing with the advice given by the panelists. There are obviously many ways to become a hit on the speaking panel. It’s up to you to find the way that works in your particular situation.


Interview with “San Antonio’s Head Nerd” – Nan Palmero

March 13, 2010

Nan Palmero is referred to as the head nerd of San Antonio. He’s at SXSWi 2010 to cover the event for the San Antonio Express-News’ web site. I asked him about his thoughts so far, beating the CEO of 4square at 4square and how he and his friends are asking weird questions to internet celebrities.


Interview with USA Today’s Jon Swartz

March 13, 2010

I had the pleasure of running into USA Today tech writer Jon Swartz at SXSWi. I asked him for his thoughts on the conference and the battle between old media and new media.


Technology For Results, Not Profits

March 13, 2010

Terry Storch and Bobby Gruenewald, pastors of LifeChurch.tv, talk user engagement for nonprofits

A nonprofit’s business model usually focuses on grants and personal donations. But what happens when the giving starts to wane, and you’re running out of resources? In their less-than-traditional panel, Technology For Results, Not Profits, “Digerati Pastor” Terry Storch and Head Pastor Bobby Grunewald of LifeChurch.tv opened discussion on ways nonprofits can maintain and even grow their support base. After about an hour of back-and-forth with audience members, engagement seemed to be the buzzword.

“Profit isn’t a bad thing. When you incorporate free tools to engage your users (like LifeChurch.tv’s youversion), you are funded from a philanthropic perspective – people donate to support the cause,” Grunewald said.

Collaborate.
Grunewald also mentioned the value in partnering with other “competitors” in the industry. Where most “for-profit” businesses might never think to collaborate with a rival, nonprofits often value their cause over anything. Audience members also shared their ideas and successes in trying to garner passionate users while still making money. Some talked up selling merchandise while giving everything else away for free. Others cited the Cafepress store as their moneymaker. Some people even develop software for other nonprofits to use. Any way you slice it, finding new and interesting ways to engage the audience was a running theme.

Watch this video of Bobby discussing the importance of collaboration with commercial and non-commercial organizations for nonprofit sustainability:

Quantify Results.
It can be even more important for nonprofits to use online analytic services to stay in touch with their communities. Because many nonprofits are local, it’s important for members to feel connected and to know that their organization is in touch with them. As a nonprofit, it’s important to see your measurable results compared to how your community is actually doing. Crunch the numbers. See if you’re making an impact.


Universities in the Free Era

March 13, 2010
Fiemann and Platt

Feimann and Platt answer audience members' questions after their panel. Photo by Scott Thomas.

“Tenure is broken and it’s holding universities back,” said the panelists at “Universities in the Free Era.

Glenn Platt from the Miami University Armstrong Institute for Interactive Media Studies and Peg Faimon from Miami University Design Collaborative talked about why they see the traditional university structure collapsing. Platt said tenure holds universities back the most. When he started teaching, a counselor told Platt that “universities change one funeral at a time.”

They both believe that because of the collapsing paid university structure we might see new forms of higher education cropping up.  

The problems facing the traditional university system are pretty numerous. First of all, the price of attending a private university averages about $25,000 per school year. Public universities are less expensive because of state appropriations, but those appropriations are decreasing every year.   The future of univeristies may be that public institutions will have the same high price value as private colleges and universities.

Platt and Faimon used an online, collaborative model as an example to a possible alternative to the traditional university. They said TED, iTunes U, YouTube.edu all offer content previously only taught at a university setting. Platt said Singularity University is taking the TED model approach and trying to form a degree program around it.  As more of this knowledge gets out into the public sphere other universities are stepping in as editors and moderators. Even traditional universities are beginning to offer Open Courseware, free lectures, notes and exams on an online basis. MIT has received a lot of the recognition for providing this structure, but they are not the only institute of higher learning to offer an online example.

Platt and Faimon did not forget about the role of the traditional professor.   They said the profession would need to evolve. They believe the traditional professor would have to take on new responsibilities, instead of just talking at their students and expecting them to write everything down. Professors should be prepared to wear many hats, including that of the project manager. The “new” professor works with students so they can accomplish they’re own goals. “Think of the professor as an angel investor,” said Platt. They should map out a road for someone to be successful. The professor should be a life coach, providing students with a ‘yes you can’ attitude.


How to Make a Living as a Blogger

March 13, 2010

The key theme from the SXSWi Panel “How to Make a Living as a Blogger?” It’s not easy. Panelists Brian Fairbanks and Colleen Kane discussed the challenges a potential professional blogger faces.

Some of the highlights:

Some of the silliest topics get the most hits. This is something a blogger has to balance. Do you really want to write about hot actresses or top Hollywood bodies? Sex is usually the easiest topics to draw traffic to your blog. Also, “top” lists are huge hit-getters, especially if they are about sex. Sites like Digg make these lists so easy to find and draw huge traffic to your blog.

Start writing your blog and eventually ask people writing similar things to help contribute. Not only are you getting free content, you’re also getting 100% of the traffic on your site.

A professional blogger in the crowd suggested bloggers should sell their brands to companies to help their brand. For instance, this blogger writes about parenting and sold a “road trip” blog to GM.

Another person in the crowd said if you have a niche blog, let a company know if you are writing about its products. It could lead to great publicity and more opportunities to write.

Bottom line: becoming a professional blogger takes a lot of work and a lot of patience. Most importantly, it takes passion that you can market.